From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lavanburg

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Aug 10, 1927
130 Misc. 551 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1927)

Opinion

August 10, 1927.

Duer, Strong Whitehead, for the petitioner.

Henry Herzbrun, for the objecting life tenant.

Francis J. MacIntyre and James J. Walker, special guardians.

[ Grant Hoerner of counsel.]


The United States Trust Company is accounting herein as trustee of two trusts created by the 7th and 8th paragraphs of the will of decedent. In each of the trusts set up under the will as of the date of death of decedent, to wit, May 19, 1915, there were included as part of the principal 180 shares of stock of the General Electric Company. From March, 1905, to December, 1924, the General Electric Company acquired all of the stock of the Electric Bond and Share Company, a subsidiary of the former company, 60,000 shares of the common stock having been acquired prior to the decedent's death, and 190,000 shares of the common and 300 shares of the preferred subsequent thereto, all but 40,007 shares of the common stock being purchased at par, the 40,007 shares being a stock dividend. After acquiring all of the stock of the Electric Bond and Share Company, the General Electric Company in December, 1924, organized the Electric Bond and Securities Company, and transferred all of the property of the Electric Bond and Share Company to the new corporation. It thereupon distributed the stock of the new corporation to the stockholders of the General Electric Company, share for share; that is, one share of the stock of the new company for each share of the General Electric Company. Upon such distribution the trustee herein received 180 shares of the Electric Bond and Securities Company for each of the trusts. Treating these shares as a distribution of the assets of the General Electric Company, the trustee has credited the stock so received to principal. To this allocation of the stock to principal, objections have been filed by one of the life beneficiaries. This presents the question to be determined in this proceeding.

The objecting life beneficiary contends that 190,000/250,000 part of this stock should be credited to income and paid to the life beneficiaries as either interest, dividends, profits or earnings of the General Electric Company. From the facts and figures submitted I hold that his contention is correct and his objections are sustained.

It appears that from the date of decedent's death, 1915, to the date of the distribution, the capital of the General Electric Company had more than doubled. The surplus during that period had trebled. The capital value of each share of stock had increased $21. The accumulated net earnings of the company, after deducting therefrom dividends paid during said period, approximated $204,000,000. Under the circumstances it must be presumed that the purchase of the stock of the Electric Bond and Share Company was from the net earnings of the General Electric Company. ( U.S. Trust Co. v. Heye, 224 N.Y. 242, 261; Bourne v. Bourne, 240 id. 172.) So much of the stock, therefore, of the Electric Bond and Securities Company as represents shares of the Electric Bond and Share Company purchased by the General Electric Company subsequent to the decedent's death should be allocated to income. The 40,007 shares distributed by the Electric Bond and Share Company after decedent's death as a stock dividend should also be allocated to income. ( Bourne v. Bourne, supra; Matter of Osborne, 209 N.Y. 450.)

Submit decree settling the account in accordance with this decision.


Summaries of

Matter of Lavanburg

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Aug 10, 1927
130 Misc. 551 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1927)
Case details for

Matter of Lavanburg

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of AMELIA LAVANBURG, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Aug 10, 1927

Citations

130 Misc. 551 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1927)
224 N.Y.S. 718

Citing Cases

Matter of Benary

Though a dividend is declared in a commodity or the evidences of title to a commodity, it must be treated as…