From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lamport

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1910
91 N.E. 1111 (N.Y. 1910)

Opinion

Argued January 6, 1910

Decided January 25, 1910

William J. O'Sullivan and John S. Jenkins for appellant.

Edmund L. Mooney, Henry G. Gennert and Enos S. Booth for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, and held that although the admission of the letter of the witness Rogers to the testator was erroneous, the error did not affect the result and should be disregarded under the provisions of section 2545 of the Code of Civil Procedure; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ. Absent: EDWARD T. BARTLETT, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Lamport

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1910
91 N.E. 1111 (N.Y. 1910)
Case details for

Matter of Lamport

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of HIRAM H. LAMPORT, Deceased…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 25, 1910

Citations

91 N.E. 1111 (N.Y. 1910)
197 N.Y. 583