Opinion
September 26, 1991
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's conclusion that claimant's feeling of isolation at work as well as the denial of her leave request and her fear of discharge, did not provide good cause for her resigning and leaving her employment (see, Matter of Serrano [Levine], 52 A.D.2d 1022). The Board's rejection of her contention that she had to resign due to her supervisor's behavior and because of her working conditions merely presented questions of fact and credibility for the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Baker [Hartnett], 147 A.D.2d 790, appeal dismissed 74 N.Y.2d 714). In any event, quitting in anticipation of discharge does not constitute good cause (Matter of Manson [Hartford Acc. Indem. Group — Levine] 50 A.D.2d 980) nor does dissatisfaction with one's supervisor (Matter of Grossman [Levine], 51 A.D.2d 853).
Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Weiss and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.