Summary
In Matter of Krywalski (26 A.D.2d 894) we decided that there was then (1966) no provision of the statute or rules of the Family Court for restitution as one of the permissible terms and conditions of probation.
Summary of this case from Matter of Bordone v. AllenOpinion
October 20, 1966
Appeal from the Erie Family Court.
Present — Bastow, J.P., Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified in accordance with the Memorandum and as modified affirmed. Memorandum: Upon the adjudication of juvenile delinquency the Family Court entered an order of disposition placing the juvenile on probation on certain terms including a direction "to make restitution of $50 to the owner of the car at the rate of $3 weekly. Industry suspended." Section 753 FCT of the Family Court Act provides that an order of disposition may provide for putting a respondent on probation in accordance with section 757 FCT of the Family Court Act. Section 757 provides the rules of court shall define permissible terms and conditions of probation. Rule 7.6 of the Rules of the Family Court of the State of New York sets forth the terms and conditions of probation which may be imposed. No provision is made in the statute or rules for restitution as one of the permissible terms and conditions of probation or suspension of judgment. The order of disposition should be modified by eliminating that part of it that requires the respondent to make restitution.