From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kruglik v. Demarest

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1996
227 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 28, 1996


Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352). A writ of prohibition does not lie to bar the enforcement of the order challenged by the petitioner ( see, Matter of Rossakis v Linakis, 199 A.D.2d 509). Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Kruglik v. Demarest

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1996
227 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Kruglik v. Demarest

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWARD KRUGLIK, Petitioner, v. CAROLYN DEMAREST, a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 28, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 392