From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kittelberger

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 20, 1958
148 N.E.2d 910 (N.Y. 1958)

Opinion

Argued January 16, 1958

Decided February 20, 1958

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, MICHAEL L. ROGERS, S.

David M. Levy, Bernard M. Pogal and Samuel Levy for appellants.

Howard M. Woods and David M. Gray for Central Trust Company of Rochester, respondent.

George J. Skivington for Frank D. Bertch, respondent.

Arthur VD. Chamberlain, special guardian, respondent.

Philip M. Liebschutz, in person, Murray De Leeuw and David M. Gray for Philip M. Liebschutz, respondent.

Edwin A. Williams and James M. Kieffer for Lora K. Martin and others, respondents.



Order of the Appellate Division entered June 19, 1957, reversing a decree entered in the Surrogate's Court of Monroe County on February 19, 1957, affirmed, without costs to any party. We do not pass on three other Appellate Division orders entered on June 19, 1957, or on the Appellate Division order entered on July 13, 1956, which four latter orders appellants seek to bring up for review under section 580 of the Civil Practice Act as necessarily affecting the first above-mentioned Appellate Division order entered on June 19, 1957. None of these four last-mentioned orders are reviewable by us on this appeal since none of them "necessarily affects" any final order within the meaning of section 580 of the Civil Practice Act. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.


Summaries of

Matter of Kittelberger

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 20, 1958
148 N.E.2d 910 (N.Y. 1958)
Case details for

Matter of Kittelberger

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Accounting of CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY OF ROCHESTER, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 20, 1958

Citations

148 N.E.2d 910 (N.Y. 1958)
148 N.E.2d 910
171 N.Y.S.2d 861

Citing Cases

Matter of Phoenix

Inasmuch as that portion of paragraph "Third" which follows the first sentence may never become operative,…

Matter of Evans

(Cf. Matter of Maxwell, 218 N.Y. 88; Matter of Kittelberger, 4 A.D.2d 218, 225, 226, affd. 4 N.Y.2d…