From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1983
58 N.Y.2d 811 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued January 10, 1983

Decided January 18, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, SHELDON M. RAND, J.

William J. Manning, Roy L. Reardon, Edward J. Nowak and John N. O'Shea for Spence-Chapin Services to Families and Children, appellant.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Trudi Mara Schleifer and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for Commissioner of Social Services, appellant.

Stanley A. Bass, Mark H. Spires and Patricia M. Callahan for respondents.

Susan Larabee, Lenore Gittis, Janet R. Fink and Kay McNally, Law Guardian.



MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice ARTHUR MARKEWICH in his dissent at the Appellate Division. In addition we note that the question as to whether periodic court review presently required for children placed in foster homes (Social Services Law, § 392) should be extended to children placed for adoption, is the subject of recent study by at least one legislative commission (see Proposal for Voluntary Foster Care Placement and Review Proceedings in Family Court, by the New York State Temp Comm to Recodify the Family Ct Act, pp 17-18 [1982]).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

Order reversed, without costs, petitions dismissed and question certified answered in the negative in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Kim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1983
58 N.Y.2d 811 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Matter of Kim

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KIM W. and Others. JOHN B. et al., Respondents…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 18, 1983

Citations

58 N.Y.2d 811 (N.Y. 1983)
459 N.Y.S.2d 262
445 N.E.2d 645

Citing Cases

Matter of Shakiba P

Article V of that Compact provides that the sending agency shall retain jurisdiction over the child…

Matter of Lucinda G

A threshold question of fact is presented concerning the date of filing of the petitions for review of the…