From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kearse v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1992
184 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 9, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.).


Test results of petitioner's urinalysis revealed the presence of cocaine. At a hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty to ingesting cocaine from a cigarette while at a party, but claimed that he did so unintentionally. In his report to the Commissioner, the Hearing Officer found that petitioner's explanation "strained credulity", and even when viewed favorably demonstrated a lack of proper judgment. The Commissioner's determination, based upon this report, was entitled to substantial deference "`because he, and not the courts, is accountable to the public for the integrity of the Department'" (Trotta v. Ward, 77 N.Y.2d 827, 828). Further, the dismissal of petitioner for using illegal drugs is not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (supra).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Kearse v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1992
184 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Kearse v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARL KEARSE, Appellant, v. LEE P. BROWN, as Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
585 N.Y.S.2d 27

Citing Cases

Matter of Danese v. New York City Tran. Auth

There was substantial evidence to support the determination of the New York City Transit Authority that the…

In Matter of Seiferheld v. Kelly

Accordingly, there is nothing left for the Board of Trustees to decide and nothing to be gained by a remand.…