From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Katsaros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 1995
212 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 24, 1995

Robert H. Straus, Brooklyn (Richard Lombardo of counsel), for petitioner.

Jay Horlick, New York City, for respondent.


On December 5, 1994, the respondent was convicted, after a jury trial, of the following Federal crimes: conspiracy to defraud banks by means of false representations ( 18 U.S.C. § 371), four counts of execution of a scheme to defraud banks ( 18 U.S.C. § 1344), and four counts of fraudulent use of a social security number ( 42 U.S.C. § 408 [a] [7] [B]). On April 28, 1995, the respondent was sentenced to three years' incarceration on each count, the terms to run concurrently, and supervised release for a term of two years.

It has been held that the Federal crime of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, is a proper predicate for automatic disbarment because that offense is "`essentially similar'" to the New York crime of scheme to defraud in the first degree, a class E felony under Penal Law § 190.65 (Matter of Cooper, 196 A.D.2d 137, 138).

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner's motion is granted without opposition from the respondent. The respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

MANGANO, P.J., BRACKEN, SULLIVAN, BALLETTA and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Thomas Katsaros, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (Rules of App. Div., 2d Dept [22 N.Y.CRR] § 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, Thomas Katsaros is commanded to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.


Summaries of

Matter of Katsaros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 1995
212 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Katsaros

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS KATSAROS, an Attorney, Respondent. GRIEVANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 24, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
630 N.Y.S.2d 251

Citing Cases

In re Matter of Powder

A further condition of the supervised release required the respondent to notify all remaining clients of his…