From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kaminski v. Casale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1997
244 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 24, 1997


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determination of the New York State Liquor Authority is supported by substantial evidence and must be confirmed ( see, CPLR 7803; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 181; Matter of Vanda Hodge Pub v. New York State Liq. Auth., 215 A.D.2d 35, 41-42). Moreover, assuming, as the petitioner contends, that the entrapment defense is available, the petitioner has not established the merits of the defense. The conduct of the police did not encourage illegal conduct, but merely afforded the petitioner an opportunity to commit the offense ( see, Matter of L R Wines Liqs. v. New York State Liq. Auth., 174 A.D.2d 570, 571; Matter of Viloria v. Sobol, 152 A.D.2d 92, 95).

O'Brien, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Kaminski v. Casale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1997
244 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Kaminski v. Casale

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HELEN KAMINSKI, as Administrator of the Estate of ALFRED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 24, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 576

Citing Cases

Matter of New Stratford Rest. v. Liq. Auth

The testimony of the undercover officer that his partner, an undercover police cadet, was served an alcoholic…

Mario Enters. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth.

The record contains sworn statements from the underage agents, as well as copies of their actual…