From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of James v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1992
184 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 22, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although the petitioner's four grandchildren, on whose behalf she received Aid to Families with Dependent Children, were of different parentage, under the circumstances of this case, since they all resided with a single caretaker (the petitioner), it was reasonable to conclude that their income and resources were pooled and that they constituted one household (cf., Matter of Padilla v. Wyman, 34 N.Y.2d 36, 40). The determination that they constituted a single household is not arbitrary and capricious. Thompson, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of James v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1992
184 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of James v. Perales

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MAUDRILLA JAMES, Appellant, v. CESAR PERALES, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Escalera v. Roberts

Each contributes his [or her] own share to the reduced pooled costs. Nor is any reduction in the standard of…