From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of James

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 1993
193 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 4, 1993

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Michael Gage, J.).


Where the fact-finding hearing in a juvenile delinquency proceeding is delayed beyond the 60-day period prescribed by Family Court Act § 340.1 (2), the proceeding must be dismissed unless "`good cause'" for an adjournment, or, in the event of successive requests for adjournments, "`special circumstances'", be shown (Matter of Frank C., 70 N.Y.2d 408, 411). The engagement of trial counsel for the presentment agency in another trial very late in the day of the last day of the speedy trial period did not constitute good cause, and thus it was not an abuse of discretion to deny the request for an adjournment made by another attorney in the presentment agency's office who advised the court that trial counsel's availability was expected at any moment (see, Matter of Detrece H., 164 A.D.2d 306; Matter of Vincent M., 125 A.D.2d 60, affd 70 N.Y.2d 793). We note that even if the presentment agency were prepared to proceed momentarily, the matter before the court was not a fact-finding hearing but a previously ordered suppression hearing.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of James

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 1993
193 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of James

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 4, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
597 N.Y.S.2d 53