From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Intemann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 20, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 20, 1993


An examination of respondent's application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this Court's rules regarding reinstatement (22 N.Y.CRR). Petitioner has advised that there is no basis upon which to oppose respondent's application. Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent's application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

Matter of Intemann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 20, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Intemann

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM H. INTEMANN, JR., an Attorney, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 20, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 1006