From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Insana v. Nordenholt Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 25, 1921
232 N.Y. 507 (N.Y. 1921)

Opinion

Argued October 6, 1921

Decided October 25, 1921

Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), and Bernard L. Shientag for appellant.

E.C. Sherwood, William B. Davis and Benjamin C. Loder for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs against the state industrial commission; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: CARDOZO, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Insana v. Nordenholt Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 25, 1921
232 N.Y. 507 (N.Y. 1921)
Case details for

Matter of Insana v. Nordenholt Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of GUISEPPE INSANA against NORDENHOLT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 25, 1921

Citations

232 N.Y. 507 (N.Y. 1921)

Citing Cases

Torres v. City of New York

Finding, in effect, that the wharf was an extension of the land, the court held that admiralty jurisdiction…