From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ingersoll v. Curran

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 2, 1947
74 N.E.2d 465 (N.Y. 1947)

Opinion

Argued July 2, 1947

Decided July 2, 1947

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County, BOOKSTEIN, J.

Samuel M. Blinken and Hyman N. Glickstein for appellant.

John Braun, Matthew M. Levy and Benjamin Gassman for the Liberal Party, amicus curiae, in support of respondent's position.

Leonard M. Lake for National Lawyers Guild, amicus curiae, in support of appellant's position.

Samuel D. Smoleff for The Citizens Union of the City of New York, amicus curiae, in support of appellant's position.

Walter M. Weis and Albert S. Bard for The City Club of New York, amicus curiae, in support of appellant's position.

Paxton Blair and Louis J. Lefkowitz for The New York Republican State Committee, amicus curiae, in support of respondent's position.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Henry S. Manley, Wendell P. Brown and Kent H. Brown of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Ingersoll v. Curran

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 2, 1947
74 N.E.2d 465 (N.Y. 1947)
Case details for

Matter of Ingersoll v. Curran

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAYMOND C. INGERSOLL, Appellant, against THOMAS J…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 2, 1947

Citations

74 N.E.2d 465 (N.Y. 1947)
74 N.E.2d 465

Citing Cases

Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc. v. New York State Quarter Horse Racing Commission

Every presumption favors the constitutional validity of a legislative enactment, and it is with great…

Matter of Yevoli v. Cristenfeld

To us it seems quite plain that a majority of the members of each of the county committees could, in the case…