From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Immediato v. Kern

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1938
16 N.E.2d 400 (N.Y. 1938)

Summary

In Matter of Immediato v. Kern (278 N.Y. 680, affg. 254 App. Div. 672) the instructions to candidates provided that the examination was planned to test their ability to read and follow instructions, one of which directed them to write on only one of three subjects.

Summary of this case from Matter of Blumenthal v. Morton

Opinion

Argued June 2, 1938

Decided July 7, 1938

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Samuel Resnicoff and Samuel J. Joseph for appellant.

William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel ( Jeremiah M. Evarts and Paxton Blair of counsel), for defendants, respondents.

Walter R. Hart and Bernard Shatzkin for intervening respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ. Dissenting: RIPPEY, J. Taking no part: CRANE, Ch. J.


Summaries of

Matter of Immediato v. Kern

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1938
16 N.E.2d 400 (N.Y. 1938)

In Matter of Immediato v. Kern (278 N.Y. 680, affg. 254 App. Div. 672) the instructions to candidates provided that the examination was planned to test their ability to read and follow instructions, one of which directed them to write on only one of three subjects.

Summary of this case from Matter of Blumenthal v. Morton
Case details for

Matter of Immediato v. Kern

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LOUIS J. IMMEDIATO, Individually and as President of the…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1938

Citations

16 N.E.2d 400 (N.Y. 1938)
16 N.E.2d 400

Citing Cases

Matter of Blumenthal v. Morton

The court directed the commission to conform to that standard and instruction by selecting one best answer to…

Matter of Gruner v. McNamara

We think that there was a reasonable basis for the commission to decide upon answer (D), that none of the…