Opinion
April 5, 1985
Appeal from the Jefferson County Family Court, Gilbert, J.
Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and O'Donnell, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Respondent mother of Ian S. contends that Family Court erred in granting unsupervised visitation to petitioner, the natural father of the boy ( see, Matter of Ian S., 110 A.D.2d 1046). There is no basis for disturbing the visitation granted by Family Court. The mother has never disputed that the father should have some visitation; rather, she argues that the court should not have permitted visitation outside her or her parents' home. The record supports the court's observations that the father "has established steady employment in the vicinity of the child" and that there is "no evidence whatever that he has been anything other than a concerned and loving father."