From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hutchinson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Mar 10, 1987
521 A.2d 676 (D.C. 1987)

Opinion

No. 85-53.

March 10, 1987.

John M. Bray, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Thomas H. Henderson, Jr., Bar Counsel, Mark W. Foster, Chairman, Washington, D.C., for Board on Professional Responsibility.

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, NEBEKER, MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, ROGERS, and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.


ORDER


On consideration of the petitions of the Board on Professional Responsibility and the Bar Counsel for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the reply of respondent thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division that the petitions for rehearing are denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this Court has voted to grant the petitions for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing en banc are granted and that the opinion of December 8, 1986, 518 A.2d 995, is hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the Court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the Court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before March 16, 1987.


Summaries of

Matter of Hutchinson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Mar 10, 1987
521 A.2d 676 (D.C. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Hutchinson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of James D. HUTCHINSON A Member of the Bar of the District…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 10, 1987

Citations

521 A.2d 676 (D.C. 1987)

Citing Cases

In re Hutchinson

Both Bar Counsel and the Board filed petitions for rehearing en banc, and on March 10, 1987, we entered an…

In re Hessler

I write separately, however, because I believe that there is a serious disparity in sanctions between cases…