From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hurst v. Hurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 2, 1996
227 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 2, 1996

Appeal from the Family Court of Fulton County (Jung, J.).


Upon respondent's failure to appear in response to the petition for modification of the visitation provisions of Family Court's order entered January 7, 1994, an inquest was held and thereafter Family Court issued an order curtailing respondent's visitation rights. Respondent appeals.

The appeal is dismissed as it is well settled that a party cannot appeal from an order entered upon default, the proper procedure being to move to vacate the default and, if necessary, appeal from the denial of that motion ( see, Matter of Ashley X., 200 A.D.2d 911; Matter of Geraldine Rose W., 196 A.D.2d 313, 317, lv dismissed 84 N.Y.2d 967; see also, CPLR 5015, 5511).

Cardona, P.J., Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Hurst v. Hurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 2, 1996
227 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Hurst v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KENNETH L. HURST, Respondent, v. CATHLEEN J. HURST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 2, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 561

Citing Cases

Matter of Shabazz v. Blackmon

Respondent appeals. It is well settled that "a party cannot appeal from an order entered upon default, the…

Matter of Khabira B

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The dispositional orders were entered…