From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hundley v. Kralik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1998
247 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 23, 1998


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The respondent's determination was supported by substantial evidence ( see, Matter of Lahey v. Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176). The conflicting testimony presented at the hearing raised issues of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436; Matter of Schurr v. Wingate, 243 A.D.2d 571; Matter of LaCanfora v. Lloyd, 229 A.D.2d 496). This record provides no basis to disturb the Hearing Officer's resolution of those issues in favor of the respondent. Further, the penalty of dismissal was not so disproportionate to the offenses committed as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222).

Thompson, J.P., Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Hundley v. Kralik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1998
247 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Hundley v. Kralik

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CALVIN HUNDLEY, Petitioner, v. JAMES KRALIK, as Sheriff…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 494

Citing Cases

McGowan v. Frankie

The Supreme Court correctly concluded that had the former attorney for the plaintiff William J. McGown…