From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hogan v. Goodspeed

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 26, 1993
82 N.Y.2d 710 (N.Y. 1993)

Opinion

Argued August 25, 1993

Decided August 26, 1993

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Loren N. Brown, J.

Thomas J. Spargo, East Berne, for appellants.

Bartlett Pontiff Stewart Rhodes, Glens Falls (Richard J. Bartlett of counsel), for Sterling T. Goodspeed, respondent.

Thomas M. Lawson, County Attorney of Warren County, Lake George (Brian S. Reichenbach of counsel), for Warren County Board of Elections, respondent.



On petitioner Montgomery's appeal, order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division ( 196 A.D.2d 675).

Appeal by petitioners Hogan and Freebern dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent at the Appellate Division was not a dissent in their favor (CPLR 5601 [a]).

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA and SMITH.


Summaries of

Matter of Hogan v. Goodspeed

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 26, 1993
82 N.Y.2d 710 (N.Y. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Hogan v. Goodspeed

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DANIEL V. HOGAN et al., Appellants, v. STERLING T…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Aug 26, 1993

Citations

82 N.Y.2d 710 (N.Y. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 793
622 N.E.2d 293

Citing Cases

Slomin v. Skaarland Construction Corp.

Weiss, J. (dissenting). Initially, I agree that plaintiff has abandoned her appeal from (or waived review of)…

Saunders v. Egriu

"The three-day cure provision for designating petitions ( Election Law § 6–134[2] ) is available for…