From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hoffman

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Dec 6, 1954
31 Misc. 2d 299 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1954)

Opinion

December 6, 1954

Cadwalader, Wickersham Taft ( H. Gilmer Wells, J. Franklin Van Deren and William S. Hack of counsel), for Bank of New York, executor, petitioner.

A.D. Levy for State Tax Commission, respondent.


The issue presented on this application to modify the pro forma order of April 28, 1953 fixing the estate tax is whether or not the appraiser has properly computed the share of the residuary estate passing to charities and allowed the proper deduction therefor. The executor and the attorney for the State Tax Commission have waived any technical objections as to the procedure in presenting the question and consent that the matter be disposed of on the merits.

The Seventh paragraph of the will directs that "all transfer, inheritance, succession and estate taxes payable by reason of my death be paid out of my residuary estate". The will contains several specific bequests and the Eighth paragraph divides the residuary estate into 60 parts, 9/60ths of which are given to charities and 51/60ths are devoted to noncharitable purposes.

In computing charities' interest in the residuary estate, the appraiser deducted the total estate tax, which included the tax attributable to 51/60ths of the residuary estate, from the net estate and divided the balance among the residuary legatees in accordance with the directions in the will. The executor concedes that it was proper under the tax clause of the will to deduct the taxes applicable to the specific legacies before calculating charities' interest in the residuary estate but that it was improper to deduct the tax chargeable to 51/60ths of the residuary estate before making such calculation. He asserts that the tax clause of the will does not prohibit an allocation of the tax among the legatees of the residuary estate.

The contention of the executor is sustained. The burden of the tax attributable to the residuary estate should be borne by those whose interests are taxed. It is only by dividing the net estate before deducting the tax chargeable to the residuary estate that charity will receive the benefit of the deduction allowed in computing the estate tax which the estate obtained because of the gifts to charity. ( Matter of Blumenthal, 182 Misc. 137, affd. 267 App. Div. 949, affd. 293 N.Y. 707; Matter of Bayne, 31 Misc.2d 296; Matter of Pratt, 31 Misc.2d 300; Matter of Campe, 205 Misc. 699; Matter of Mattes, 205 Misc. 1098.) The increase in the amount of the residuary estate passing to charity in accordance with this decision will result in a reduction of the estate tax by the sum of $1,472.50. Submit order on notice modifying the pro forma order fixing tax accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Hoffman

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Dec 6, 1954
31 Misc. 2d 299 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1954)
Case details for

Matter of Hoffman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of MARY U. HOFFMAN, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Dec 6, 1954

Citations

31 Misc. 2d 299 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1954)
138 N.Y.S.2d 492

Citing Cases

Matter of Williams

Unfortunately for the beneficiaries of this trust, the cases uniformly hold that a tax clause such as that…

Matter of Shubert

4 A.D.2d 1019, motion for leave to app. den. 5 A.D.2d 814, 4 N.Y.2d 676; Matter of Foss, 29 Misc.2d 876;…