From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hempstead General Hospital v. National Grange Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 1989
151 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

June 26, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Shaughnessy, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the application is granted, the master arbitration award is vacated, and the expedited arbitration award is confirmed.

Judicial review of a master arbitrator's vacatur of an award pursuant to Insurance Law § 5106 derives from CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (iii) and involves the question of whether the master arbitrator exceeded his power (see, Matter of Smith [Firemen's Ins. Co.], 55 N.Y.2d 224; Matter of Petrofsky [Allstate Ins. Co.], 54 N.Y.2d 207). In reviewing a compulsory arbitration award pursuant to 11 NYCRR 65.18 (a) (1) the master arbitrator is empowered to vacate the award on any of the grounds specified in CPLR 7511 or on the basis that the hearing arbitrator acted in a manner which was arbitrary, capricious or without rational basis. However, review of procedural and factual matters is outside his powers of review (see, 11 NYCRR 65.18 [a] [4]; Matter of Smith [Firemen's Ins. Co.], supra). In the instant case, the master arbitrator vacated the original arbitration award "in the interests of justice". We find that in so holding, the master arbitrator exceeded his authority by substituting his discretion for that of the hearing arbitrator, without a finding of misconduct by the hearing arbitrator (CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [i]), or that he acted in a manner which was arbitrary, capricious or without rational basis (Matter of Petrofsky [Allstate Ins. Co.], supra). We note that the subject of this arbitration was an unpaid hospital bill in the sum of $154.92. In these circumstances the denial by the hearing arbitrator of the request for an adjournment made for the first time at the conclusion of the hearing did not rise to the level of misconduct.

While the master arbitrator did not reach the issue of whether the award of attorney's fees granted in the original arbitration award was proper, we find that they were awarded in accordance with the limitations prescribed in 11 N.Y.CRR part 65. Therefore, we confirm the expedited arbitration award in all respects. Mollen, P.J., Spatt, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hempstead General Hospital v. National Grange Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 1989
151 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Hempstead General Hospital v. National Grange Mutual Insurance

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HEMPSTEAD GENERAL HOSPITAL, as Assignee of JOHN E. YOUNG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 26, 1989

Citations

151 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
542 N.Y.S.2d 780

Citing Cases

Hempstead General Hospital v. National Grange Mutual Insurance

On August 31, 1988, the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Shaughnessy, J.), dismissed the proceeding. By…