From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Harris v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 18, 1999
264 A.D.2d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

August 18, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner purchased an index number, filed the signed order to show cause and, as the respondent Patrick Williams implicitly conceded, served him personally in accordance with the terms of the order to show cause within the applicable Statute of Limitations period. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly determined that the petitioner's failure to affix the index number and filing date to the petition served on Williams, as specified in the order to show cause, was not a jurisdictional defect and was excusable under the circumstances ( see, Matter of City of Amsterdam v. Board of Assessors, 237 A.D.2d 63; Maldonado v. County of Suffolk, 229 A.D.2d 376).

O'Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Harris v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 18, 1999
264 A.D.2d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Harris v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DARLENE HARRIS, Respondent, v. PATRICK WILLIAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 18, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 144

Citing Cases

Lynch v. Duffy

PERSONAL JURISDICTIONPetitioner's failure to include an index number or date of filing on the verified…

Kopel v. Nassau County Board of Elections

However, it has been held that in a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating a candidate in a primary…