Summary
In Matter of Hansen v. Marblette Corp. (24 N.Y.S.2d 200, affd. 260 App. Div. 866) the court held that the petitioner being engaged in a competing business "is not a sufficient justification for refusing the application altogether", citing the Ludwig case.
Summary of this case from Matter of Malone v. Dimco Corp.Opinion
October 7, 1940.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.
Final order directing appellant to permit an examination and inspection of certain of its books and records by respondent unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the examination to proceed on five days' notice. No opinion.