From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hamilton

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 14, 1997
688 A.2d 582 (N.J. 1997)

Opinion

February 14, 1997.

Reprimanded.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 10, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that DAVID R. HAMILTON of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4 (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter); and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID R. HAMILTON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

Matter of Hamilton

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 14, 1997
688 A.2d 582 (N.J. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DAVID R. HAMILTON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 14, 1997

Citations

688 A.2d 582 (N.J. 1997)
688 A.2d 582

Citing Cases

In re Hunt

As to respondent's violations of RPC 1.1 (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4 (failure…