From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Haglund v. Bayer Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

March, 1935.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.


Claimant had been employed for a number of years by the H.A. Metz Laboratories, Inc., and during part of that period had occasion to use benzol in his employment. Immediately thereafter he was employed by the Bayer Company in the use of benzol, between August, 1931, and November 8, 1931. On the latter date he was stricken with benzol poisoning. The Bayer Company seeks to apportion the award between the two employers and their carriers. The family doctor of the claimant testifies that he examined the man twice a year for five years before he became disabled, and that there was no history of prior poisoning. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Haglund v. Bayer Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Matter of Haglund v. Bayer Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of H. HAGLUND, Respondent, against THE BAYER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)