Opinion
December 9, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Sullivan County (Kane, J.).
In denying parole to petitioner, respondent took into consideration the serious nature of the offense, the circumstances surrounding his conviction, his prior criminal record (which includes two prison sentences for violent felonies) and his several instances of past parole violations. As these reasons are supported by the record and satisfy the requirements of Executive Law § 259-i, its decision is not subject to further judicial review. Supreme Court's decision to dismiss the petition must therefore be upheld.
Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Crew III, White and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.