From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Green v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 12, 1966
25 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

May 12, 1966

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: By a judgment of separation dated March 11, 1957 custody of the four children of the marriage was granted to appellant mother with visitation privileges to the respondent father. Upon the father's motion to secure custody of the children, Special Term modified the judgment and granted custody of the two sons to the father. At the hearing held on this motion the court examined the children, Carol age 16, Michael age 14, Patricia age 13 and Robert age 11, and all of them definitely expressed a desire to continue to live as a family unit with their mother. There was no proof in the record of any change in circumstances during the nine years since the judgment, except that the children were nine years older. There is a complete absence of any showing that the mother is an unfit person to rear the children or that the children's welfare and best interests have suffered in any respect under her care. Under these circumstances it was an abuse of discretion to have changed custody of the sons and the provisions of the separation judgment, so far as it relates to the children, should in all respects be followed.


Summaries of

Matter of Green v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 12, 1966
25 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Green v. Green

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARGARET S. GREEN, Appellant, v. J. PAUL GREEN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 12, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Salk v. Salk

This evidence also was given weight and consideration in the court's determination that it was beneficial for…

Matter of Coleman v. Coleman

Under the assumption that it is beneficial for siblings to be reared together, courts should be reluctant to…