Opinion
May 16, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the respondent's determination was supported by substantial evidence presented at the hearing (see, CPLR 7803). The petitioner's challenge to the facial constitutionality of the regulation in question is without merit (see, Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89). Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.