Opinion
September 9, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
There is no merit to the petitioner's contention that he was deprived of his rights to preliminary and final parole revocation hearings prior to the revocation of his parole. The petitioner's parole was revoked by operation of law as a result of a conviction in 1988 for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (see, Matter of Cohen v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 131 Misc.2d 495; People ex rel. Conyers v. New York State Div. of Parole, 130 Misc.2d 33). Accordingly, the petitioner had no right to a preliminary revocation hearing (see, Executive Law § 259-i [c] [i]; Matter of Alevras v Chairman of N.Y. Bd. of Parole, 118 A.D.2d 1020, 1021) nor to a final parole revocation hearing (see, Executive Law § 259-i [d] [iii]; People ex rel. Harris v. Sullivan, 74 N.Y.2d 305; Matter of Pierre v. Rodriguez, 131 A.D.2d 763, 764).
We have reviewed the petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Eiber, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.