From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1977
57 A.D.2d 90 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

April 19, 1977.

Herman Frankel of counsel (Morris B. Gerstenhaber with him on the brief), for petitioner.

No appearance on behalf of respondent.


The Bronx County Bar Association filed a petition containing 11 charges of misconduct against the respondent. The charges related to eight separate business transactions. In each transaction, the respondent unlawfully retained sums of money rightfully belonging to others and did not return the money even after demand.

Respondent in some instances retained fees which he was paid even though he rendered no services and, in other instances, he retained money which was entrusted to him to be held in escrow. In one transaction upon which three charges are based, the respondent wrongfully kept over $26,000 which was the proceeds of the sale of real property.

At the hearing before the Referee, testimony was taken relating to all charges but for charge X. The complainant in that instance had moved and was unavailable to testify.

All of the charges preferred (with the exception of charge X) were sustained by the Referee, and the report of the Referee is confirmed.

We note that respondent did not present any evidence in mitigation of the charges. The record before this court amply indicates that respondent lacks the moral fitness to continue as a member of the legal profession. He should be disbarred (Matter of Liesner, 43 A.D.2d 223).

KUPFERMAN, J.P., LUPIANO, SILVERMAN, LANE and MARKEWICH, JJ., concur.

Respondent's name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York, effective May 19, 1977.


Summaries of

Matter of Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1977
57 A.D.2d 90 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Matter of Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MAXIMINO GONZALEZ, an Attorney, Respondent. BRONX COUNTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1977

Citations

57 A.D.2d 90 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
393 N.Y.S.2d 415

Citing Cases

Matter of Shuchman

Notwithstanding the foregoing considerations, the overriding fact remains that respondent has converted stock…

Matter of Shuchman

Notwithstanding the foregoing considerations, the fact remains that the respondent has converted stock with a…