Opinion
October 10, 1989
Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not properly lie under the instant circumstances in view of the apparent lack of merit of the petitioner's contentions and the availability of an adequate remedy at law (see, Matter of Lipari v Owens, 70 N.Y.2d 731; Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 N.Y.2d 718). Lawrence, J.P., Rubin, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.