Opinion
August 3, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The dismissal of this proceeding, inter alia, to review certain assessments on the petitioner's property was appropriate inasmuch as the proceeding was both procedurally defective ( see, N Y City Charter § 163 [b], [c], [f]; Matter of G.A.D. Holding Co. v. City of N.Y. Dept. of Fin., 192 A.D.2d 441) and untimely ( see, CPLR 217; N Y City Charter § 166; Matter of M D Contrs. v. New York City Dept. of Health, 233 A.D.2d 230; 45435 Realty Co. v. City of New York, 200 A.D.2d 501; Matter of Cauldwest Realty Corp. v. City of New York, 160 A.D.2d 489; Matter of Miller v. McGough, 97 A.D.2d 416).
Miller, J. P., Altman, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.