From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaudiuso v. Chu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 7, 1988
139 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

April 7, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Klein, J.).


Following service of a notice of a petition and petition by petitioners, respondents moved to dismiss on objections in point of law based upon a number of defects in the petition. Supreme Court granted the motion and this appeal ensued.

The petition is patently defective in that it is not the petition of the real parties in interest, is not verified and fails to allege compliance with Tax Law § 1138 (a) (4). The court has the power to cure or ignore various defects (see, CPLR 2001, 3026), but in view of petitioners' failure to appear or otherwise respond to the motion to dismiss, we see no reason to disturb Supreme Court's dismissal of the defective petition herein.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gaudiuso v. Chu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 7, 1988
139 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Gaudiuso v. Chu

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NICK GAUDIUSO et al., Doing Business as NICK AND TONY'S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1988

Citations

139 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)