From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Garnica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 13, 1999
261 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 13, 1999

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant was discharged from her employment as a laundry attendant as a result of failing to notify the employer of a practical joke whereby sewing machine oil was placed in a co-worker's drinking cup. Although claimant did not personally place the hazardous substance in the co-worker's cup, she nevertheless was aware that the "joke" was being perpetrated. Contrary to the employer's established policy, claimant failed to report the potentially dangerous situation to the employer. Given claimant's conduct, which was detrimental to the employer's best interest and contrary to the standards of behavior that the employer had a right to expect, together with the potentially serious consequences of the incident, we find substantial evidence in the record to support the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was discharged from her employment due to disqualifying misconduct ( see generally, Matter of Rohnke [Hudacs], 192 A.D.2d 812, 813). Claimant's remaining contentions, including her assertion that her conduct merely constituted poor judgment, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Garnica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 13, 1999
261 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Garnica

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of GINA C. GARNICA, Appellant. DOLCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 13, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 778