From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Garnette v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 2, 2000
270 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 2, 2000

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Kwame S. Garnette, Gouverneur, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, CREW III, SPAIN and CARPINELLO, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged with violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting the commission of a sexual offense, lewd exposure and violating facility visitation regulations after a correction officer, having already warned petitioner about his behavior, witnessed petitioner's visitor fondle his groin and thereafter noticed petitioner exposing his genitals. After a tier III hearing, petitioner was found guilty of these charges and, thereafter, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the determination. We confirm.

Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who authored it after observing petitioner's conduct, provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of McNair v. Goord, 265 A.D.2d 716, 697 N.Y.S.2d 183; Matter of Garcia v. Goord, 261 A.D.2d 674,lv dismissed 94 N.Y.2d 834 [Dec. 2, 1999]). Although petitioner contended that he never exposed himself, this merely raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Garcia v. Goord, supra). To the extent that petitioner's remaining contentions have been preserved for our review, we find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Garnette v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 2, 2000
270 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Garnette v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KWAME S. GARNETTE, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 2, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 759

Citing Cases

Mulcahy v. Selsky

Petitioner responded by pulling down his pants, exposing his genitals and shouting, "Keep lock this." Later…

Matter of Donato v. Duncan

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of lewd exposure and being out of place. Contrary to…