From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garfield v. Holz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 1956
1 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

February 24, 1956


The order of Special Term should be affirmed. It may not be said that the refusal of the Superintendent of Insurance and the Attorney-General, was without reasonable basis. We do not pass upon any of the other questions ruled upon by Special Term, including the question as to whether this policyholder has the right to institute suit. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents.

Concur — Peck, P.J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Frank, JJ.


Summaries of

Garfield v. Holz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 1956
1 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Garfield v. Holz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GUSTAVE B. GARFIELD, on Behalf of Himself and All Members…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 24, 1956

Citations

1 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)