From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Garayua v. New York City Police Dept

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1986
68 N.Y.2d 970 (N.Y. 1986)

Opinion

Argued October 15, 1986

Decided November 20, 1986

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Kenneth L. Shorter, J.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Francis F. Caputo and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for appellants.

Raymond E. Kerno and Richard Hartman for Rose Garayua, respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The orders of the Appellate Division in the above-entitled proceedings should be affirmed, with costs.

The city police department and its director of personnel, without objecting to the authority of the city Civil Service Commission to hear the matter de novo, participated in an evidentiary hearing before the Commission on Ms. Garayua's disqualification, presenting their own witnesses and cross-examining Ms. Garayua's. Moreover, even after the Commission's decision was announced, the police department and personnel director continued to treat the Commission as the primary fact finder by moving for a reopening of the case on grounds of "newly discovered evidence" alone.

Having fully taken part in this proceeding, the agency and personnel director charted their own procedural course and cannot now be heard to complain because the Civil Service Commission made findings and exercised its own discretion on the basis of the facts placed before it. At this point, all that a reviewing court may do is examine the Commission's determination to ensure that its discretionary determination with respect to the penalty was not so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233). Inasmuch as the Commission's decision to direct Garayua's reinstatement was within the range of the rational conclusions that could be reached on the basis of the record before it, that decision must be upheld and obeyed.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur; Judge KAYE taking no part.

In each case: Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Garayua v. New York City Police Dept

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1986
68 N.Y.2d 970 (N.Y. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Garayua v. New York City Police Dept

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROSE GARAYUA, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 20, 1986

Citations

68 N.Y.2d 970 (N.Y. 1986)
510 N.Y.S.2d 547
503 N.E.2d 103

Citing Cases

City of New York v. City Civil Service Commission

Alternatively, since the DOP fully participated in the proceeding before the CSC, the DOP cannot now be heard…

Reeves v. Associated Newspapers, Ltd.

Instead, plaintiffs confined their substantive argument to CPLR 3211(a). Plaintiffs charted their own…