From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gademsky v. Masset

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1082 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 17, 1995

Present — Lawton, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Motion for counsel fees, costs and disbursements and cross motion for counsel fees, costs, disbursements and sanctions denied. Memorandum: We decline to award either party counsel fees and costs or to impose financial sanctions pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1. It cannot be said that either party has engaged in frivolous conduct (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]). Furthermore, an application for an award of appellate counsel fees should be addressed to Family Court (see, Family Ct Act § 651 [a]; Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]; Matter of O'Neil v. O'Neil, 193 A.D.2d 16, 18).


Summaries of

Matter of Gademsky v. Masset

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1082 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Gademsky v. Masset

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARK GADEMSKY, Appellant, v. MARY BETH MASSET, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 1082 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 973

Citing Cases

Sunrise Nursing Home, Inc. v. Ferris

We therefore affirm the order in appeal No. 1. Finally, we decline to impose sanctions against appellate…

In re Ashley v. Delarm

Rather, the court stated that "it is not clear to this Court that this proceeding was commenced with the…