From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fura v. Seddon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 4, 1991
176 A.D.2d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

October 4, 1991

Appeal from the Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J.

Present — Callahan, A.P.J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Niagara County Family Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following Memorandum: The issue of visitation should be determined only after a plenary hearing based on the best interests of the child (Matter of Elizabeth D., 127 A.D.2d 971). Although the court conducted a minimal inquiry regarding the living circumstances of each party, the Judge acknowledged that he did not know whether the infant would be adversely affected by overnight visitation with the natural father. Under the circumstances, the court erred in summarily granting the father's petition for overnight visitation. We remit the matter for an evidentiary hearing and direct that a Law Guardian be appointed for the child (see, Family Ct Act § 241, 249 [a]).


Summaries of

Fura v. Seddon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 4, 1991
176 A.D.2d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Fura v. Seddon

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DENNIS FURA, Respondent, v. KIM E. SEDDON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

Matter of Mallory v. Mashack

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., HAYES, PIGOTT, JR., SCUDDER AND CALLAHAN, JJ. Order unanimously reversed on the law…

Matter of Langdon v. Stephen

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Cattaraugus County Family Court…