From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Fulford v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 28, 1994
203 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 28, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Washington County.


We find that the record contains sufficient material to enable the Hearing Officer to independently assess the credibility of the confidential informants and the reliability of the information. There is no requirement that the Hearing Officer personally interview the confidential informants. This confidential information, as well as the testimony presented, provided substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt.

Cardona, P.J., White, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Fulford v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 28, 1994
203 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Fulford v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SAMUEL FULFORD, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 971