Opinion
April 10, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.).
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The respondent investigated the petitioner's complaint pursuant to the requirements set forth in Education Law § 6510 (1) (b). Its determination that no violations had occurred is a discretionary one for which review in a proceeding in the nature of mandamus is unavailable (see, Matter of Mullen v Axelrod, 74 N.Y.2d 580). Sullivan, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.