From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Frisina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 23, 1997
235 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

January 23, 1997.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 26, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Before: Mikoll, J.P., White, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ.


Claimant was employed as a funeral director at a funeral home in which he owned a one-half interest. Claimant left this employment after selling his interest therein to his business partner. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. We affirm. A claimant who has sold his interest in an employing corporation without a compelling reason to do so will be found to have left his employment under disqualifying circumstances ( see, Matter of Ballard [Hartnett], 176 AD2d 428, 429). In this matter, substantial evidence supports the determination that there was no compelling motivation, either economic or otherwise, for claimant's sale of his interest in the funeral home. While claimant testified to the contrary, such conflict constituted a question of fact for resolution by the Board ( see, Matter of Tepper [Sweeney], 228 AD2d 856; Matter of Sonin [Sweeney], 226 AD2d 790).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Frisina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 23, 1997
235 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Frisina

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ROBERT J. FRISINA, SR., Appellant. JOHN E…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1997

Citations

235 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
653 N.Y.S.2d 174

Citing Cases

Matter of Schonwit

Claimant's subsequent application for unemployment insurance benefits was denied on the ground that he left…

In re Deney

Claimant first takes issue with the Board's conclusion that he voluntarily quit his employment when the…