From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Frech

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Jul 27, 1927
130 Misc. 283 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1927)

Opinion

July 27, 1927.

Taylor, Blanc, Capron Marsh [ John B. Marsh and Edward M. Cameron, Jr., of counsel], for the petitioner.

Levy Fullerton, for William T. Frech.

Rowe Walsh, for Henry H. Frech.

[ C.B. Petchtle of counsel.]

Howard A. Butler, special guardian.


In this application for a compulsory accounting, a construction of decedent's will is sought. In the latter, testator created a life estate in the residuum to his wife and directed that upon her death the principal should be divided among his children share and share alike. He further provided that "if any child of mine shall have died, I give and devise to the descendants of such child or children the share the parent would have been entitled to receive if living at the date of the death of my wife." The testator was survived by seven children. Three of these predeceased the widow. One of the three died without issue. Another was survived by a son, Peter Hofsess, Jr., who is still living and has a daughter, Catherine Hofsess, a great granddaughter of the testator. The third was survived by a son, John J. Frech, 2d, who also predeceased the life tenant, and two daughters, Emma L. Mander and Grace Frech Murray. Emma L. Mander is living and has a son, Albert E. Mander, Jr., a great grandson of the testator. The question propounded is whether the share which any child of testator who died before the widow, Catherine Frech, would have received "if living at the date of the death of my wife" shall be distributed among "the descendants of such child" per stirpes or per capita. I hold that the distribution should be per stirpes. The intention of the testator that a stirpital distribution should be made is evidenced by his gift to the descendants of "the share the parent would have been entitled to receive if living at the date of the death of my wife." ( N.Y. Life Ins. Trust Co. v. Winthrop, 237 N.Y. 93, 105; Matter of Farmers' Loan Trust Co., 213 id. 168, 174.) The words "issue" and "descendants" are interchangeable terms. ( Matter of Durant, 231 N.Y. 41, 46; Matter of Farmers' Loan Trust Co., supra.) I hold that the trust should be divided into six shares, one for each of the four children who survived the life tenant and one for each of the two children who died during the life of the life tenant leaving issue surviving. The one-sixth share to which John J. Frech, Jr., would have been entitled to if living should be distributed, onehalf to Grace Frech Murray and one-half to Emma L. Mander. The share to which Maria A. Hofsess would have been entitled to if living should be paid to Peter Hofsess, Jr.

Submit decree on notice construing the will and settling the account accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Frech

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Jul 27, 1927
130 Misc. 283 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1927)
Case details for

Matter of Frech

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of JOHN J. FRECH, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Jul 27, 1927

Citations

130 Misc. 283 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1927)
224 N.Y.S. 285

Citing Cases

Matter of Wellbrock

The court accordingly determines that the will of testator requires the distribution of the remainder of the…

Matter of Libby

In Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Polk (166 App. Div. 43, 48-49) the court saw "no reason why the rule…