From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Francis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 3, 1991
176 A.D.2d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

October 3, 1991

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant admitted that he received the decision of the Administrative Law Judge denying his claim for benefits within a few days of the date of the decision (July 27, 1990). He did not appeal that decision until September 17, 1990, well after the expiration of the 20-day time limitation for filing such appeals (Labor Law § 621). The only excuse he offered was that he never read the back of the decision which set forth the 20-day time period. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board was free to reject claimant's assertion that he was misled by the Administrative Law Judge in regard to his right to appeal. Accordingly, the decision by the Board that claimant's appeal was untimely must be upheld (see, Matter of Chapman [Roberts], 138 A.D.2d 866). Claimant's remaining contentions have been considered and rejected as lacking in merit.

Mahoney, P.J., Weiss, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Francis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 3, 1991
176 A.D.2d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Francis

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of KENNETH FRANCIS, Appellant. THOMAS F…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 3, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
574 N.Y.S.2d 607