From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ford

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 8, 1976
355 N.E.2d 295 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued June 2, 1976

Decided July 8, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOHN H. PENNOCK, J.

George H. Rosen and Lazarus I. Levine for appellants.

W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (William P. Murray and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that claimants' privilege under the 1927 deed "to bathe in Flagler Lake" was a mere license, not an easement (see, also, 3 Warren's Weed, New York Real Property, License, § 1.03). Thus, the claim is for indirect damage to real estate "not taken" (Administrative Code of City of New York, § K51-44.0) and interest runs only from the date the award was confirmed, not the date of the taking (Hudson Riv. Tel. Co. v City of New York, 210 N.Y. 394, 397-398).

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG. Taking no part: Judge COOKE.


Summaries of

Matter of Ford

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 8, 1976
355 N.E.2d 295 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Ford

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ARTHUR C. FORD et al., Constituting the Board of Water…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 8, 1976

Citations

355 N.E.2d 295 (N.Y. 1976)
355 N.E.2d 295
387 N.Y.S.2d 240

Citing Cases

Scheer v. Kahn

We modify this award to reflect the amount claimed by the plaintiff with interest from November 5, 1993, the…