From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Florick v. Broad Window Cleaning Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 9, 1926
154 N.E. 611 (N.Y. 1926)

Opinion

Argued June 4, 1926

Decided July 9, 1926

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Paul Koch and Charles O. Truex for appellants.

Albert Ottinger, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Florick v. Broad Window Cleaning Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 9, 1926
154 N.E. 611 (N.Y. 1926)
Case details for

Matter of Florick v. Broad Window Cleaning Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of LOUIS FLORICK, Respondent, against BROAD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 9, 1926

Citations

154 N.E. 611 (N.Y. 1926)
154 N.E. 611

Citing Cases

Matter of Leone v. Bricklayers

The board rejected the appellants' contentions, but it did grant the modification sought by the claimant.…

Dietrick v. Kemper Ins. Co.

(Emphasis added.) Workers' Compensation Law § 15 (3) provides that compensation for permanent partial…