From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of First Merchants National Bank v. Wade

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 5, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 398 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)

Opinion

April 5, 1962

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, New York County, J. DANIEL FINK, J.

Egan Bliss ( Herbert J. Bliss of counsel), for appellant.

Abrams Cowan ( Maurice Abrams of counsel), for respondent.


The sole source of the judgment debtor's income was the disability pension received by him from the United States Government as a retired air force officer. By the express language of section 667 of the Civil Practice Act a pension is exempt from seizure in any legal proceeding. It has been authoritatively determined that section 793 of the Civil Practice Act has not abolished or curtailed this exemption ( Ley Realty Corp. v. Foley, 161 Misc. 666; Ford v. Bailey, 259 App. Div. 505).

It was error to grant the application for the payment of installments from the pension of the judgment debtor.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., GOLD and CAPOZZOLI, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of First Merchants National Bank v. Wade

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 5, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 398 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
Case details for

Matter of First Merchants National Bank v. Wade

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FIRST MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK OF RICHMOND, Respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Apr 5, 1962

Citations

35 Misc. 2d 398 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
232 N.Y.S.2d 636