Opinion
August 18, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the petitioners' assertions on appeal, the Supreme Court correctly held that the information concerning the subscribing witnesses on the challenged pages of the respondents' designating petitions substantially complied with the requirements of the Election Law (see, Election Law §§ 6-130, 6-132; see, Matter of Regan v Starkweather, 186 A.D.2d 980; Matter of Wilson v McClean, 175 A.D.2d 935, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 857). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.